KIDLINGTON PARISH COUNCIL
This document contains the Chairman's Report for the month of December 2021. Previous monthly reports follow on, below.
idlington residents may have been surprised (once again) to read the recent announcements that Oxford United Football Club (OUFC) are planning to relocate their stadium and related
activities to Stratfield Brake (SB) in Kidlington. The Parish Council only learnt of the plans shortly beforehand, over Christmas.
SB is owned by Oxford County Council (OCC), leased by Cherwell District Council (CDC), and sub-leased by the Parish Council and Gosford and Water Eaton Council. It is
now managed on a day-to-day basis by CDC, but the Parish Council continues to contribute a very substantial operating subsidy. Regular users of the sports ground include
Kidlington Cricket Club, Gosford All Blacks Rugby Club, Kidlington Running Club, Kidlington Youth Football Club. There is no doubt of SB's importance for sport in Kidlington,
but the financial cost of supporting it is very high in relation to the number of Kidlington users, moreover many of the users come from outside Kidlington.
OUFC's current plans cover both the present SB site on the West of Frieze Way, and the triangle of land opposite it on the other side of Frieze way,
with its top corner at the Sainsburys roundabout. The whole development would comprise a new 18,000 capacity football stadium with ancillary leisure and
commercial facilities including hotel, retail, conference, and training/community grounds. We understand (subject to confirmation) that extensive on-site parking
is not planned for fans, who will be encouraged to use public transport or the two nearby park-and-rides, with improved pedestrian connections to the stadium.
At the time of writing, the OCC cabinet is about to be asked to enter into negotiations with OUFC and SB's current tenants (including us) to "enable the
use of OCC owned land for the development of a new football stadium, subject to planning permission". This includes the following objectives (to quote
from the on-line cabinet agenda):
maintain a green barrier between Oxford and Kidlington and improve access to nature and green spaces;
enhance facilities for local sports groups and on-going financial support;
significantly improve the infrastructure connectivity in this location, improving public transport to reduce the need for car travel in so far as possible, and to
improve sustainable transport through increased walking, cycling and rail use;
develop local employment opportunities in Oxfordshire;
increase education and innovation through the provision of a sports centre of excellence and facilities linked to elite sport, community sport, health and wellbeing;
support OCC's net zero carbon emissions pledge through high sustainable development;
There are a number of very obvious advantages to this scheme. Many will see it as a prestige asset for the Village, it should guarantee improved sporting facilities for
Kidlington residents, it should save the Parish Council a great deal of expense which could be diverted to other purposes, and it will create employment opportunities.
The disadvantages are equally obvious. It will involve further erosion of the Green Belt around the village, it will create traffic congestion, and possibly major parking
problems in the Village, particularly Garden City and Gosford, and there will be noise pollution, possibly from events such as rock concerts as well as matches. Agreements
could be put in place to mitigate some of these problems, but how reliable will they be in the long term?
The Parish Council is therefore faced with a very difficult decision, as it is likely that opinions in the Village will be strongly divided. What we have to do is look
at the proposals seriously and with an open mind, and negotiate to see how they could be modified or developed to meet the needs and concerns of Kidlington residents,
particularly with regard to traffic and parking, green spaces, biodiversity and use of the Green Belt. Then we will decide whether or not to support the proposals, and if
we do support them, subject to what conditions. Our priority throughout must be to represent as well as we can the interests of Kidlington residents as a whole, not
those of OCC or OUFC.
idlington residents may have been a little surprised to receive a consultation letter from Cherwell District Council asking for their views on a possible merger between Kidlington and Gosford and Water Eaton Parish Councils (KPC and GWE). This is not a proposal that we have initiated out of the blue. It is our response to Cherwell's request for submissions to the Governance Review that they are currently undertaking.
Given that the proposed change would have little day-to-day impact on our residents, we did not think we could justify the cost of sending them a special newsletter on the subject — though GWE have sent one to their residents. We have however put a page on our website giving the reasons for our position. I will take the opportunity to run through the arguments here.
Kidlington currently has more than 14,000 residents, GWE about 1,400. Most of the homes in GWE are in the triangle between the two Bicester Roads and the main Oxford Road (P on the consultation letter map below). For all practical purposes this area is part of Kidlington. It includes Gosford Hill, the school where most Kidlington children study, and its residents mostly use KPC facilities. The rest of GWE consists of a small number of houses to the East of the North-South Bicester link road, though the number of houses will increase very considerably with the new developments that are currently planned by Cherwell District Council.
We think it is in residents' interests that the two parishes should merge for the following reasons:
- the current division between the two parishes is a historical accident which no longer has any real justification;
- we would all benefit practically and financially from the sharing of facilities and staff;
- most importantly, a merged council would be larger and stronger, and thus better placed to represent residents' interests, and in particular to resist the further encroachments on the Green Belt that are threatened;
- new housing developments in GWE will add 1790 new houses to the parish; a large and strong council would be better placed to deal with the problems and issues that will arise as a result of such a huge increase in population;
- KPC's council tax charge to residents is slightly higher than GWE's: currently just over £27 a year more for a Band D property. This is because KPC provides most of the facilities for both parishes. In contrast, GWE has very few facilities of its own.
- Two GWE councillors are also KPC councillors so we already work very closely together – this proposal would formalise and strengthen that arrangement.
As an alternative to a full merger, we think that the boundary between the two parishes could be redrawn along the North-South Bicester link road, which would form a much more natural boundary between the two parishes. This means that the area marked P on the map below would become part of Kidlington Parish.
he return to normal activities has continued in the form of a successful Guy Fawkes Night on November 5th, after last year's cancellation, with the usual fireworks display at Stratfield Brake. On a lovely clear night attendance, judging by the ticket receipts, was at or near record levels. Nevertheless times are changing, and with current prospects for the environment the Council will have to consider whether celebrations should continue in the traditional form, or whether some alternatives need to be found.
Last year the usual Remembrance Day ceremonies could only take place in a very restricted form, with a closed wreath-laying by the Deputy Lord Lieutenant and myself at the St Mary's Memorial on November 11th, and a separately recorded version of the full ceremony on YouTube. This year, I'm pleased to say, the normal service and ceremony will be taking place at St Mary’s Church on Remembrance Sunday, followed by the traditional parade. We shall also have once again the usual switch-on event for the Christmas lights on December 2nd.
October saw the Kidlington Eco Festival, the series of community events planned jointly, under the title "Revival for Survival", with the churches and other groups in the run-up to the COP26 conference in Glasgow. Activities included eco-themed workshops, community action projects, and a speaker series: the programme can be seen online here
. It culminated in a successful Community Day at Lyne Road Green on 30 October with stands for local organizations, apple-pressing, and a visit by our MP Layla Moran. A number of trees have been planted along the road side of the Green, between the concrete blocks which were placed there after the traveller incursion last year, and which will be removed once a sufficient natural barrier has been formed. More tree- and hedge-planting is planned, there and elsewhere in the Village.
Let me however turn to the less pleasant subject of Covid cases. These reached a peak in Kidlington North and South in mid-July, dropped thereafter, and have been going up and down since then, at points in September and October to a level higher than July. Levels have generally been higher in Kidlington South, for whatever reason. Overall the numbers in the two areas roughly track each other, and also track the corresponding numbers for Oxfordshire and England as a whole — though since the populations of our two units are relatively small, they are likely to have seen more random variations.
At the time of writing, I am lucky enough to be in Italy, where it is interesting to see how national stereotypes have apparently been reversed. Mask-wearing is obligatory in indoor spaces open to the public and on public transport, and is very widely observed, far more so than in England. Vaccination passes are required for restaurants and for trains, and seem to be shown and checked with minimum inconvenience and fuss. Whatever one may think of these measures (but I am speaking here for myself, not the Council), they do seem to work.
ajor planning issues currently loom large on the Council agenda, with consultations on the Oxford-Cambridge Arc, the Oxfordshire 2050 plan, and the Cherwell 2040 Local Plan.
All of these have large-scale implications for Kidlington and its surroundings.
The Arc, readers will remember, is the major government economic development scheme for the counties stretching from Oxford to Cambridge, originally associated with the apparently
defunct East-West Expressway. The present consultation about The Oxford-Cambridge Arc
) is vague about numbers, but those previously
associated with the scheme envisaged a million new dwellings across the counties, and doubling the population of Oxfordshire.
The Council is by no means against growth, but we believe growth on the scale apparently envisaged for this region is incompatible with national levelling-up policies, and does not
take sufficient account of a number of other critical factors: changing work conditions post-Covid, the potential of IT, the already excessive pressure on transport infrastructure,
the need to protect the environment and the Green Belt, the challenge of the climate emergency.
Many of these objections also apply to The Oxfordshire 2050 Plan
), which is strongly growth-led.
We would like to see greater emphasis on social, economic and environmental well-being as much as on growth. We are concerned about the continuing threat to the Green Belt
posed by Oxford City's unmet housing need. We would like to see stronger provision for affordable housing, and more attention to the problems of traffic congestion.
The Cherwell 2040 Plan
) poses a number of significant questions specifically about Kidlington.
The answers are not all clear cut. Do we need a policy to control the redevelopment of houses or plots into flats? There are arguments against this, but it may be
a price for preserving the Green Belt around us. Do we want a Green Belt review to accommodate employment as opposed to housing needs? Given low unemployment
in the area, we might want to say no to this. Do we want to prevent the conversion of village centre retail and leisure premises to housing? Perhaps within limits: more residents
in the centre would also increase business activity.
On two questions the Council has long-held views. Do we want to maintain and protect the existing village centre? Yes, but we also need more: a clearer and stronger design
framework for planning that will help to make the centre an even better place. Do we want to investigate expanding the centre to include Exeter Close? Again, yes. We are planning
an extensive redevelopment of Exeter Close to include a new civic centre, and probably commercial premises as well. We also want the Oxford Road at this point to become less of a
road and more an extension of the High Street, with enhanced shopping and other facilities, and a 20-mph speed limit: compare the London Road in the centre of Headington.
The Cherwell consultation does not include an option for further housing development on the Green Belt around Kidlington, but that does not mean that it will not happen:
it is a matter for the Oxfordshire plan.
idlington is surrounded by Green Belt, but as everyone knows this is about to change: how will it look after 4,400 new houses are built
in our area? There will still be Green Belt between us and Oxford to the South, and between us and Begbroke and Yarnton to the West,
but it will be much reduced. The rest of the Green Belt circle will remain unchanged, including the very beautiful fields to the East.
To the South-East, in Gosford and Water Eaton parish, there will be new building all along the North-South Bicester Road from the Sainsburys
roundabout to the existing houses in Gosford. On its Southern side this development of 440 homes will be separated from Oxford by a triangle
of Green belt with the base along the A34 and the apex at the Sainsburys roundabout; along its Eastern side, between Water Eaton Lane
and the A34, the rest of the Green Belt will remain.
To the South-West will be the only new housing development in Kidlington proper, 120 houses at Stratfield Farm. This will be bordered
on the South by the Green Belt playing fields at Stratfield Brake and the open land to the West of them. On the Western side of the Village,
bounded by the canal, there will be a continuous Green Belt corridor between us and the massive developments of 1950 houses at
Begbroke and 540 at Yarnton.
We may not like these new developments, therefore, but they certainly don't have the drastic consequences for us that they have
for Begbroke and Yarnton. It is also worth underlining that Cherwell Council's delivery requirements include a number of other
green provisions. There will be play areas, allotments, and a cemetery extension within the Bicester Road development, an enhanced
area of woodland along the south-eastern boundary of the site, and 11 hectares of land to provide formal sports facilities in the
remaining Green Belt triangle. At Stratfield Farm requirements include the provision of play areas, allotments, the extension and
protection of the existing orchard and, over about half the site, a nature conservation area on 5.3 hectares.
This leads me to the subject of green spaces within the existing Village. As well as the wildlife reserve at St Mary's Fields,
we have six substantial sports grounds. Scattered across the Village there are also a good number of attractive smaller greens, all
of them well provided with trees: the largest is at Lyne Road, with a dozen or so others, depending on how you count them, at places
like Foxdown Close, Wilsdon Way, and Alexander Close. We now have a web page dedicated to these small greens, with photos and a
Google map, here
. They are an important asset for the village.
Overall it looks as if later housing developments are better provided in this respect than older ones. Cherwell Council's requirements
for the new developments continue this upward trend. The Parish Council will be watching carefully to see that these requirements are met.
t has been good to see that (at the time of writing) new Covid cases have been going steadily down in Kidlington, as in Oxfordshire as a whole.
We are now well below the national average, having been way above it not many weeks ago. But the overall level is still a cause for real concern.
The Council has continued along the slow path to normality. Having cancelled the annual Gala Day last year because of the pandemic,
we were able to hold it in Exeter Close this July, in Covid-safe conditions outdoors, and were very gratified by the number, range and
interest of the attractions, and the high level of attendance throughout. Catering was provided by the admirable Cherwell Collective who, with their
usual remarkable ability to find helpers, had enlisted a group of army chefs: they did brisk business.
Another summer activity has been the revision of the Council's web pages here
. The main aim
is to reflect better the evolving nature of the Council's activities, especially through a new section on the environment. This details
our work and plans for trees, green spaces, rewilding, walking and cycling, and traffic, and highlights the eco activities of Cherwell
Collective, including a new lunch club for residents on Thursdays at 12 in Exeter Hall, that uses only surplus, seasonal, or locally grown produce.
We are also working with the Kidlington Churches, Cherwell Collective and other stakeholders to organize an Eco Festival in October, in
the period leading up to the COP26 climate change conference in Glasgow in October/November.
One environmental issue that has been raised recently, in the last issue of Kidlington News and elsewhere, is noise from the airport.
This is certainly a great deal less bad than it was when I first moved to the village, more than 20 years ago, but it can still be annoying,
especially on warm summer days in the garden. Unfortunately there is not much that can be done about it. There is an Airport Consultative Committee,
which Parish and District Councillors attend. This was recently reconvened at our request, and should meet regularly from now on. Councillors
raise residents' concerns at these meetings, but we have no authority at all over the airport. If residents feel that there has been nuisance
flying, the best thing they can do is complain direct: the airport has a Local Community & Environment webpage with a number and email address for
complaints: see here
Finally, it is sad to record that Cherwell Development Watch Alliance has lost its legal challenge to the planned development
of 4,400 houses in and around Kidlington to meet Oxford' housing needs. All credit to the Alliance nevertheless, for demonstrating
that Green Belt encroachments such as this will not go unchallenged. But all we can do now is work with the developers and the District
Council to try and minimize the resultant infrastructure problems, and gain such benefits as can be obtained.
hat kind of place is Kidlington? Oxford City has published an extensive set of statistical profiles of
Oxfordshire parishes derived from government
data by Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion. The Kidlington report is dated January 2021 and you can
download the original document from here
The report measures data for Kidlington against those for Cherwell and the UK as a whole,
and while the results are generally not surprising, they are nonetheless interesting.
The population of Kidlington is estimated (2019) at 13,979, excluding Gosford and Water Eaton. We are the eighth
largest urban centre in Oxfordshire, and the third largest in Cherwell. The population has remained stable from 2001 to 2019,
whereas it has gone up by 12%-14% in Cherwell and England. We have slightly less residents under 16 than the Cherwell
and England averages, and slightly more aged 65 and over.
In the 2011 census our white British population at 81.6% was slightly more than the England average, but the
proportion born outside the UK, 14.7%, was also slightly more. We had rather more pensioner households than
the England average (24.1% versus 20.7%), rather less one-person under 65 households (12.5% versus 17.9%),
and rather less lone-parent families (18.3% versus 24.5%). It will be interesting to see how this changes in
the census that has just been completed.
Unemployment (November 2020) is significantly lower than the England average (3.4% versus 6.5%), and the same
goes for youth unemployment (18-24: 4.9% versus 9.2%). The percentage of children in low-income families, in 2018, was
again lower than the Cherwell and England averages (8.9% versus 12.7% and 18.2%).
Also from the 2011 census, we had slightly more detached houses than the England average, significantly more
semi-detached (43.6% versus 30.7%), and slightly less terraced. Our percentage of owner-occupiers was well
above the England average (75.7% versus 64.1%), and the percentage of social-rented households well
below (9.6% versus 17.7%). The average house price last year was £323,297, slightly above the England average, and
the number of dwellings in Council Tax Bands C-E was well above Cherwell and England numbers. But it will surprise
no one to learn that on all calculations of housing affordability we do significantly worse than the England average.
On quality of life indicators, the incidence of crime in Kidlington is well below the England average on all counts:
less than half for the year to August 2020, with the proportion of anti-social behaviour, burglaries and robberies
much lower still. On life expectancy counts we do very slightly better than Cherwell and England. On other well-being
indices we seem to be pretty much around the average, as we are on education. But annual household income (2017-8)
is above the average for Cherwell and England.
According to the 2011 census, 84% of residents are satisfied with the local area as a place to live, as against an
average 79% for England. All of which seems to confirm that Kidlington is in many respects a fairly average
and in many a better-than-average place to live, with the one major problem of housing affordability.
n the first week of June there were fewer than three new Covid cases
in Kidlington North and Kidlington South respectively, but sadly rather
more in the surrounding areas. On 24 June the Parish Council will be
holding its second physical meeting since lockdown, but we are prepared
if necessary to revert to meeting on-line. If we do, we will continue
to follow our published calendar and arrange for public participation.
Let's hope it won't be necessary.
The recent local elections produced some notable changes. We have a new
Green Party County Councillor for Kidlington South, Ian Middleton, who
is also a Kidlington Parish Councillor. We also have a new Conservative County Councillor for Kidlington North and Kirtlington, Nigel Simpson, who was my predecessor as Chair of the Parish Council. We look forward to working closely with both of them. Cherwell District Council has a new LibDem member in the person of Dorothy Walker, who represents Kidlington West along with two existing LibDem members, Conrad Copeland and Katherine Tyson, both also Parish Councillors.
Kidlington Parish Council has a majority of LibDem members, but I don't
want to make too much of that. Councillors work well together
regardless of party, and it is very rare indeed for divisions
to arise along party lines. The important thing for us is to have good
working relations with District and County Councillors, because much of
our agenda is to represent Kidlington interests with the next two
levels of local government. This is also achieved, of course, by
our Council officers working closely, as they do, with officers
at the next two levels.
Nevertheless there are times when Kidlington's voice is not heard as
clearly in Cherwell as we might wish. To counter this, we are
negotiating with the District Council for the establishment of a
permanent Kidlington work group, with a designated liaison officer.
Progress on this front has been slow, however. While we are the third
largest urban centre in the District, I sometimes think that being
termed a village means that we are not taken quite as seriously as
we would be if we were a town — though it would make no difference to
our powers. But we remain mindful of the experience of our predecessors
many years ago, who redesignated Kidlington as a town, and were forced
to reverse the decision by the resulting public outcry.
We had a good relationship with Ian Hudspeth, the former Leader of the
County Council who lost his seat to a LibDem in the May elections. We
shall see what difference a LibDem-led County Council will make to us.
One potential area of common interest is the so called Arc
development scheme that still plans a massive increase in the
population of Oxfordshire, although the associated plans for an
Oxford-Cambridge Expressway seem to be on ice. We view with concern
the scale of population increase that is envisaged, and we hope
that the new County Council will too.
ith the easing of lockdown, the Parish Council is partly moving back to physical meetings:
we have just held the statutory Annual Meeting face-to-face in Exeter Hall. We shall also
hold our next full Council meeting there on 24 June, if current expectations are confirmed
of the end of work-from-home on 21 June. Between now and then, however, we shall continue
to hold our Standing Committee meetings on-line, with the public invited to attend as before.
We also held our Annual Parish Meeting on-line on 29 April and were very pleased with the
way it went, with some 40 participants, including our MP Layla Moran.
Overall in terms of efficiency on-line meetings have worked well, and will no doubt continue
for some of our activities from now on into the future. But they do lack much of the stimulus
and interchange that face-to-face meetings produce. Not all the future is on-line.
We are taking bookings in Exeter Hall again, subject to Covid precautions. I'm pleased
to say that an NHS vaccination service will be operating there from later this month,
and also that the seniors' lunch club will be resuming. In future all our catering
will be provided from surplus or locally produced food by the remarkable Cherwell
Collective, who run the Cherwell Larder and much else from Exeter Hall, and whose Emily
Connally made an impressive presentation at the Annual Parish Meeting. Cherwell Collective
were the recent UK winners of the European Economic and Social Committee’s Civic Solidarity
prize for their ground-breaking work, combining food distribution and support services
with an educational programme to help residents grow their own food and reduce waste:
Assuming that the return to normal life continues according to plan, we shall hold
our annual Gala Day in Exeter Close on Saturday 24 July. This is mainly an outdoors
event with a variety of free activities including a Children's Petting Zoo, Donkey Rides,
Climbing Wall, Drumming Workshop. In 2019 we introduced the 'Green Road' to the
day's activities, featuring organisations such as Wild Oxfordshire, the Canal and
River Trust, K5 Better Together, and St Mary's Fields. We also hope to have the
annual fireworks at Stratfield Brake, currently planned for 5 November, and the
switching on of the Christmas Lights in early December.
Ongoing activities include the options appraisal which is about the be initiated
for the redevelopment of Exeter Close, including Exeter Hall, the medical and
related practices, and the Forum building. We have commissioned a design for
the extension of the Bicester Road Cemetery, since space in the existing burial
area will run out in a few years' time. Management of the Stratfield Brake sports
facilities has now been taken over by Cherwell District Council, which has meant
some saving in time and money for the Parish Council, though the long-term
arrangements have yet to be decided. We have written to Oxford County Council
about the closure of the Glebe House care home, requesting further access to the
data on which the decision was based, and urging that the building should be
reserved for community use; we have not yet had a reply. And finally, we await
the outcome of the judicial review of Cherwell’s plans to allow 4,400 new houses
in our area. The hearing of the challenge by the admirable Cherwell Development
Watch will be in late June.
February & March 2021
ollowing the Covid roadmap, our tennis and games courts and outdoor gym are now open;
playgrounds have been open for a while. But Exeter Hall remains closed to the general
public, and most staff continue to work from home. At the time of writing, there is
some uncertainty as to when we shall revert to formal meetings in person. For the
present these are being held on-line, including the Annual Parish Meeting on
the evening of Thursday 28 April 2021. Instructions for joining this will be
published one week beforehand on our website here
The Parish Council has set its budget for the financial year starting in April,
involving a precept (our share of the council tax) of £728,300, an increase of 1.6%
on the previous year. Due to a reduction in the number of properties or residents
eligible to pay council tax, this has resulted in a 1.9% increase in real terms,
still below the projected rate of inflation. It is worth noting that over the
previous ten years the overall increase in the precept has also been below the
corresponding rate of inflation. We have managed to do this while at the same
time maintaining and indeed increasing our range of activities and services,
the most notable new addition being our environment and climate change agenda.
Following the incursion by travellers last summer and the subsequent installation
of unsightly concrete blocks, the Council has been working on a project to keep
Lyne Road Green safe, whilst also making it a more interesting space for local
residents and more attractive to invertebrates and birds. Residents local
to the green have received information about the project, and many have
expressed an interest in getting involved in protecting the area. A draft
plan for trees and hedging was drawn up with help from Wild Oxfordshire:
you can find it on the Council website.
Residents will also soon notice tracts of uncut grass in public spaces.
This is the start of the Parish Council’s habitat regeneration initiative.
Plants emerging from the relaxed mowing will be catalogued, and native
wildflowers introduced for bees and butterflies, while longer grass
helps small mammals such as shrews and voles. This will provide homes
for wildlife displaced by the housing developments about to surround us.
From time to time trees have to be felled for safety reasons. This is
not a decision that the Council takes lightly, and we are committed to
ensuring that whenever we remove a tree, we plant at least two to replace it.
In line with a county-wide initiative, we are pressing for a 20 mph limit
in residential streets. We are currently considering an ambitious walking
and cycling network plan for the village, developed by the K5 Better
Together health project. With the 20 mph limit, this envisages low traffic
neighbourhoods and so-called quiet lanes, where the whole road space
is shared by people and vehicles. For a village that likes to be
family-friendly, it all makes very good sense. Implementation
will depend, however, on the availability of government grants.
he national lockdown after Christmas has obliged us to close our tennis and games courts and the outdoor gym (the latter despite contradictory guidelines from the government), but for the time being playgrounds remain open. Office staff continue to work from home, while grounds staff continue to work outside.
As far as Kidlington is concerned, lockdown has not come too soon. Some of you will have looked at the Covid data map here
. It makes grim reading for Oxfordshire in general and Kidlington in particular, but with some striking differences. Kidlington North and South had 4 and 3 cases respectively in the week to 11 December. After that numbers increased very rapidly, until the week to 8 January when Kidlington North had 41 new cases and Kidlington South 59. (Kidlington North and South are statistical geography divisions or MLSOAs, not the same as council wards; the border runs very roughly along Yarnton Road and Evans Lane.)
As of 8 January, along with a number of areas in or around Bicester and Banbury, Cowley, Littlemore and Blackbird Leys, Kidlington South is now in the worst band of England cases, North in the next worst. Most of the rest of Oxfordshire is in same band as Kidlington North, or one band better. North Central Oxford, Oxford Central and Summertown are either one or two bands better.
All of this can change from one day to the next, but it brings home the extent to which we have been caught up in the national disaster. The good news is of course that vaccinations have begun. The Kidlington medical practices have chosen Islip as the site that best meets a complex and very demanding set of requirements. But patients with concerns about accessibility can be assured that when they are contacted for the vaccine and they genuinely can’t travel, then alternative arrangements will be made at the time. Patients will still receive their vaccine at their allotted time and will be contacted by their practice; they should not contact practices in advance themselves.
The Cherwell Community Larder continues to operate a weekly food distribution market from Exeter Hall for those in need, and the North Oxfordshire Foodbank is distributing food parcels from its base in the Baptist Church. Kidlington and Surrounding Areas (KASA) Coronavirus Community Help is there to provide personal help, and a range of other support services are available by phone or email, provided by Citizen’s Advice, Cherwell Council, and other organizations. Up-to-date details of all these services can be found on our Covid help web pages here
Despite everything, we are also continuing with our greening agenda and other development activities. We are working on plans for landscape enhancement at Bicester Road cemetery and Lyne Road green, the latter to include measures to prevent a repeat of the traveller invasion last summer. We will be installing more covered seating facilities for young people in Exeter Close, and with the County Council and the medical practices we are moving forward with the Exeter Close redevelopment agenda.
irst, some thoughts prompted by the end of our second lockdown and an extraordinary and very difficult year. There has been great hardship and distress for many, and sadly more hardship and distress will come as the economic impact of Covid makes itself increasingly felt. Thanks to the remarkable volunteer organizations in our area, together with the services provided by the District and County Councils, there have been emergency support systems available to all, and we have done our best to publicize them. We can only hope that none of our residents have fallen through this net.
Council meetings have adapted smoothly to taking place on line, and even after the emergency some will no doubt continue in this form. But they inevitably lack the stimulus, support and give-and-take of physical presence. This has been particularly difficult for our office staff, who have valiantly ensured that all of our statutory services have continued. Our grounds staff have also ensured that our open spaces and facilities are maintained to the usual standard. The council is deeply grateful to all staff in both categories for their unfailing hard work and good will throughout this difficult time.
Covid meant that we had to cancel not only the annual Gala Day and the Fireworks Display, but also the Christmas lights Switch-On event. Nevertheless the lights are up, and there are handsome trees at the top of the High Street, Exeter Hall and the Broadway. We could not put the usual tree in the Piazza off the High Street, because a market stall has been moved there to ensure social distancing.
Covid did not prevent our contractors from completing work on the Bicester Road cemetery, though some small issues will wait for the Spring. This was the main outcome of a process that began shortly after the present Council was elected last year, well before the waterlogging problems of the winter, and has proceeded without delay thereafter. A substantial new network of drains and paths has been installed, far more extensive than anything carried out since the cemetery was first opened. This will reduce significantly the problems of waterlogging we experienced at times in the past, although it may not remove them completely in extreme weather. But the new paths will make access to graves easier whatever the condition of the ground. We are now proceeding with additional landscaping of the site.
Finally, the Council decided at its last meeting to oppose Network Rail's planned closure of the Sandy Lane level crossing. The arguments for closure mainly concern the substantial growth planned in rail traffic along the line, and the fact that new housing developments in Yarnton and Begbroke will significantly increase road traffic along the lane. But we decided that on balance these arguments should not outweigh the likely loss of business for Kidlington centre traders, not to mention the inconvenience for Kidlington residents driving to Yarnton. This is simply one issue that
illustrates the urgent need for greater clarity about the impact of planned housing developments in Kidlington and surroundings as a whole.
s we enter the second lockdown, the Council's office staff are back to working almost entirely from home, tennis courts and the outdoor gym have been closed, and Exeter Hall bookings limited to essential work meetings. Uncertainty about the new regulations also led us, regretfully, to cancel the usual Remembrance Sunday service and parade. Instead we held a virtual event on the preceding Friday, in which the names of Kidlington and Hampton Poyle residents who died in the last century's wars were read out, the bugle played, two minutes' silence observed, and wreaths laid by representatives of local organizations. The whole event was recorded on video, and published on the Council website here
on Remembrance Sunday morning: do please take a look. We hope people will see it as an appropriate and moving commemoration, in the present circumstances, of those who sacrificed their lives for their country.
How the new lockdown will affect Kidlington residents remains to be seen, but we can be sure that for many it will cause very real difficulties. The two local foodbanks continue with their invaluable work, the Cherwell Community Larder operating from Exeter Hall, and the North Oxfordshire Foodbank from the Baptist Church. Kidlington and Surrounding Areas (KASA) Coronavirus Community Help still has its teams of volunteers available to provide support for those who cannot leave their homes for whatever reason. We are updating the details about the support available during the emergency, and about services provided by local businesses and other organizations, on our webpage here
It is a relief to be able to report two items of good news. The High Street bollard has been working most of the time. Looking forward to next year, the County Council have applied to the Department of Transport to provide civil parking enforcement in Cherwell and other districts from this time in 2021. This is something we have long been pressing for. It means that parking regulations will be enforced by traffic wardens rather than by the police, who no doubt understandably have tended to have other priorities.
Three major issues for the future remain in the realm of uncertainty. While planning for the Oxford-Cambridge Expressway seems to have paused, the massive long-term development scheme known as the Oxford-Cambridge Arc still remains on the table, with the consequent prospect of a huge increase in the Oxfordshire population. Within Oxfordshire discussions on local government reorganization, and the possible integration of the five district councils into a single council for the county, have also paused. Whether or not this is desirable is a matter for debate, but there will be a real advantage if it brings with it a greater devolution of powers, something at present sadly lacking in the British government system. Finally, we are watching with some concern the progress of the government's White Paper Planning for the Future
, which looks like removing much of the protection of essential interests that the present system provides.
ince my last report, where I referred to the formal adoption of Cherwell's Partial Review of its Local Plan, the Council has agreed to support the application of the Cherwell Development Watch Alliance for a legal challenge to the plan based on two issues: that the calculation of Oxford's housing needs (4400 houses) is unsound, and should have been far lower; and that that proper provision was not made for a replacement of the North Oxford Golf Course in order to build houses on it. There are two stages to the process: first, obtaining permission to proceed to judicial review; second, if permission is given, the judicial review itself. At present we have agreed to support the first stage, and depending on the outcome, we will decide whether to support the second stage. Permission could be given to proceed on one issue, or both, or neither.
If the application is unsuccessful, what will Kidlington look like in ten years' time, when the proposed new housing has been completed? The Green Belt gap between us and Oxford will have been reduced to a narrow strip between the A34 and the railway line, after 1360 new houses have been built South of the railway. There will be 120 new houses at the South-West end of the village, by Stratfield Brake, and 430 around the Bicester Road cemetery. The size of Yarnton and Begbroke will be vastly increased, with 2490 new houses in the two villages, though we will be separated from the developments by a green gap between the railway line and the canal. All of this will be of limited value to Kidlington residents, since the affordable housing will be reserved for Oxford's needs
All of this makes the work that the Council is currently doing on environmental issues doubly important: not just as a response to global warming, but also to keep Kidlington as far as possible a green and pleasant place despite all the surrounding housing development. At the end of last year, along with many other councils, we declared a Climate Change Emergency, which means, among other things, that we are committed to try and make Council activities net-zero-carbon by 2030, and work with other partners to the same end. We have a Climate Emergency Working Party, which will involve local residents outside the Council, to develop and exchange new ideas for action. We are also developing new policies and initiatives on habitat restoration, rewilding, trees, cycling and walking, as well as an ambitious long-term scheme for a circular linear park or Green Ring around the village, a series of green spaces linked together by cycling and walking routes. We are looking at the provision of electrical charging points for cars around the village, and are about to instal solar lighting at the Orchard Recreational Ground, having already done so at Exeter Close and Ron Groves Recreation Ground.
All of this complements the work we are doing with Cherwell Council's K5 Better Together scheme to promote health and well-being in Kidlington and the surrounding parishes.
hings have calmed down at the Council since the successful but expensive removal of the travellers on Lyne Road Green last month.
The offices remain closed to the public, although most of our staff are back at Exeter Hall or have continued to work around the Parish throughout the pandemic.
The recent updates to Covid regulations are somewhat confusing, but do allow us to take bookings of more than six people in Exeter Hall and the
Pavilion providing we can guarantee social distancing and other measures to keep people safe. While these premises are considered Covid secure,
sadly we are not yet able to accommodate important social events, particularly those for older people such as the Lunch Club. Other Oxfordshire
councils are following the same rules.
A significant proportion of the Council's income comes from charges for the hire of facilities, and this has been much reduced as a result of Covid,
though the loss has been partly offset by concurrent savings. This will remain a serious concern in the short-to-medium term, and will lead to some
difficult choices as we begin the process of setting budgets for next year.
All Council meetings continue to be held on-line, via Zoom, and the main ones remain open to the public as usual: see the Council
webpage (linked at the foot of this page) for details about meetings and instructions about how to attend.
The Cherwell District Council Local Plan has now been approved by the Inspector and formally adopted, though there might still be the
possibility of a judicial review. As I have said before, of the 4400 houses allocated to this part of the District to meet Oxford's
housing need, only a few will be built in Kidlington proper: 120 at Stratfield Farm, by the Sainsbury's roundabout.
However, 430 will be built in Gosford around the Bicester Road cemetery, and the remainder in Begbroke and Yarnton and
south of the A34 on either side of the main road into Oxford. This will not only remove most of the Green Belt gap between us
and Oxford, but will also create real pressure on transport infrastructure and much else. One specific consequence is likely to be
the blocking of vehicle access to Sandy Lane in Yarnton, with Network Rail set to close the two Yarnton level crossings. This will have
an impact on the use of Kidlington's shops by Yarnton and Begbroke residents, as well as making access to the Yarnton Garden Centre more
difficult for us. On the other hand, if the road is not closed, the added traffic resulting from the new housing developments is likely
to make it unsustainable in its present form.
Finally, we have reached the last stage of the programme of work on the Bicester Road cemetery which began shortly after
the present Council was elected last year, and well before the waterlogging problems that occurred last winter. We have
received planning permission for an extensive new network of drains and paths, we have chosen a contractor, and we expect work
to begin by the end of the month and finish by December.
August & July 2020
was thinking that, given the time of year, there wasn't much to report on this occasion. That all changed with the travellers' invasion of the Lyne Road green.
For those that don't know it, the green is a large and pleasant open space towards the top of the village between Lyne Road and the railway line. On Friday 31 July it was reported that a small number of travellers' caravans had set up camp there, and in the next days the number increased to 13 or more. The land belongs to the Parish Council, but negotiation with travellers is in the first place the responsibility of the County Council, who have a travellers officer. He visited the site on the Monday, and was told that the caravans were there for a wedding and would leave the next day. He visited the next day and was told that the wedding celebrations were continuing and they would leave on Wednesday. On Wednesday they were still there and said they were not leaving.
There are three ways to evict trespassers of this kind. The County Council can apply for a court order, but the process is slow, probably more so during the Covid emergency. The police can evict forcibly, but will only do so if there is hard prosecutable evidence of criminality or significant harm. In this case they declined to act, perhaps partly as a matter of prioritization, partly because they knew that the Council was willing to act. This left us with the third option of calling in bailiffs to evict, which is what we did.
The bailiffs served notice of eviction on Wednesday afternoon, with a deadline for departure of 1 pm the next day. When that time came there was still no sign of departure, so the bailiffs went in and started the eviction process. By 6 pm the site had been cleared, to the credit of the bailiffs in a peaceful manner. The police were also present to prevent disturbances. We left security guards in place overnight, and from first thing on Friday we were placing concrete blocks along the roadside edge of the green as a temporary measure to prevent access. This will give us time to consider long-term measures of a less unsightly kind, such as the creation of an earth ridge, perhaps with a ditch alongside.
All this has cost the Council several thousand pounds of council-tax payers' money, but I hope residents will agree that it is money well spent. I also hope they will feel that we acted as fast as we reasonably could. It is best to try negotiation to begin with in such cases, but as soon as it was clear that negotiation would not work we resorted to other means.
The invasion caused a great deal of anxiety, distress and nuisance to residents, and I want to thank them for their forbearance in putting up with it in such a civil manner. I also want to thank the County Council travellers officer for his advice and support, and the police for theirs. Cherwell District Council sent in a cleansing team during the occupation, and they were apparently subjected to some abuse. They then cleansed the site thoroughly on Friday morning. Thanks go to them, and then particularly to Parish Councillors and staff for their help, and above all our Facilities Manger Graham Kearney and his team who remained well ahead of the game throughout.
On other matters, Exeter Hall remains closed to the public at the time of writing, apart from a few bookings. Councillors and office staff have continued to work mainly at home since the lockdown, and we shall continue with our calendar of on-line Council and committee meetings. Playgrounds, tennis courts and cemeteries are all open. Tenders for the drainage work at the Bicester Road cemetery are now in, and we aim to start work as soon as we can once we have received planning permission.
The three main volunteer organizations active in the Village are still doing sterling work to meet Covid-related needs: Kidlington and Surrounding Areas Community Hub (KASA), the North Oxfordshire Food Bank and the Cherwell Community Larder, as well as several other smaller initiatives, all count among the heroes and heroines of the present emergency.